Airport security uses talk as tactic
By Thomas Frank, USA TODAY
The Transportation Security Administration plans to train screeners at
40 major airports next year to pick out possible terrorists by engaging
travelers in a casual conversation to detect whether a person appears
nervous or evasive and needs extra scrutiny.
The new security technique, already in use at some airports, adds a psychological
dimension to screening by trying to find high-risk passengers based on
how they act at checkpoints or boarding gates. (Related story: Body
language can blow suspects' cover)
Passengers who raise suspicions will undergo extra physical screening
and could face police questioning.
Airports in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Detroit and Miami
recently began using the technique.
Some airport and transit police already look for people acting oddly —
such as wearing a heavy coat in the summer or appearing to be doing surveillance
— and question them about travel plans.
"I don't want (officers) just sitting there waiting for a call
to come in. I want them observing people, observing their behavior and
engaging them in conversation. They're looking for people whose activities
don't look right," says Alvy Dodson, public safety director at Dallas/Fort
Worth International Airport. Last year, 70% of DFW's 167 airport police
were trained in the program.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) says the technique leads to
racial profiling and has sued to stop a behavior-screening program run
by the Massachusetts State Police at Boston's Logan International Airport.
That program, the first at a U.S. airport when it began in 2002, was challenged
last year after a black ACLU official said he was questioned and threatened
with arrest if he didn't show identification.
"If you're going to allow police to make searches, question people
and even make arrests based on criteria rather than actual evidence of
criminality, you're going to have racial profiling," says Barry Steinhardt,
a privacy law specialist at the ACLU.
Massachusetts State Police Sgt. Peter DiDomenica calls the program "an
antidote to racial profiling" that focuses on "objective behavioral
characteristics." He says the program has curbed racial profiling
"because we've educated people."
Behavior detection is routine in security-conscious countries such as
Israel, where air travelers routinely face aggressive questioning.
U.S. Customs officers have long asked arriving travelers questions, often
in random order. If a person gives "stumbling answers," that
could indicate the person has fraudulent travel documents or plans to
overstay a visa, says Customs and Border Protection spokeswoman Kelly
Klundt.
The TSA also began using behavior detection at Logan in 2003 and last
year at airports in Warwick, R.I., and Portland, Maine. Mass transit systems
in New York City and Washington adopted the technique after train bombings
in Madrid and London.
Concerns about racial profiling have meant "there's been a lot
of reluctance in TSA to expand this," says George Naccara, TSA security
director at Logan.
Naccara says he persuaded TSA chief Kip Hawley to try behavior detection
at numerous high-risk airports. "It's another effective layer of
security which is relatively cheap," Naccara says.
"Bathroom Security Requires Tactics With Patrols, Cameras"
Corporate Security (12/15/2005) P. 7
Corporate security departments should be sure to include bathrooms in
their security plans and operations. Bathrooms are easy to overlook, but
problems that can occur there include muggings, sexual assaults, and medical
emergencies. The first step toward bathroom security begins with having
security officers check bathrooms on a regular basis. For example, the
Stratosphere Hotel and Casino/Las Vegas conducts a security sweep of its
bathrooms every hour of the day, every day of the week. Arthur Steele,
vice president of security operations for the hotel, notes that bathrooms
pose a risk of potential liability, so he has his security guards make
an entry of each hourly visit in their patrol reports, and Steele keeps
those reports on file for 30 days. Winning gamblers have sometimes been
followed into bathrooms and been robbed, and people have had heart attacks
and not been discovered for hours, Steele says. Steele also instructs
his guards to look out for leaking water or liquid soap on the floor.
Positioning a security camera outside the bathroom entrance--at an unobtrusive
angle--can serve as a deterrent to crime and help record any criminal
activity.
"Bush Details Plan for More Effective Information Sharing"
National Journal's Technology Daily (12/19/05) ; Stirland, Sarah Lai
President Bush announced plans to improve the way terrorism-related data
between federal, state, and local governments is shared, as well as the
private sector. Lawmakers, along with government department and agency
heads, received guidelines and requirements from Bush that detailed the
role and scope of authority of department chiefs. The Bush administration
seeks to provide a better understanding of how government officials should
handle classified information as they share data in an effort to build
what they call the "information-sharing environment." "The
ISE is intended to enable the federal government and our state, local,
tribal and private-sector partners to share appropriate information relating
to terrorists, their threats, plans, networks, supporters, and capabilities
while, at the same time, respecting the information privacy and other
legal rights of all Americans," Bush said in a letter to Congress.
"Creating the ISE is a difficult and complex task that will require
a sustained effort and strong partnership with the Congress." James
Lewis of the Center for Strategic and International Studies says the previous
lack of clarity on how to handle sharing sensitive terrorism-related data
among federal and state officials was a major obstacle for effectively
preventing terrorist attacks, as reported by the Sept. 11, 2001 commission.
(go to web site
www.govexec.com/dailyfed/1205/121905tdpm1.htm)
SK Sharma
The views and facts stated above are entirely
the responsibility of the author and do not reflect the views of this
Association in any manner.
|